<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Poster Child for Web Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/</link>
	<description>Terrible writing and mere conjecture</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hidden Links &#187; JLH Design Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>Hidden Links &#187; JLH Design Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>[...] the bow of website owners everywhere with his post regarding hidden links, different in nature than hidden text. His post sends a clear indication that hidden links is something that the spam team is aware of, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the bow of website owners everywhere with his post regarding hidden links, different in nature than hidden text. His post sends a clear indication that hidden links is something that the spam team is aware of, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLH</title>
		<link>http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1471</link>
		<dc:creator>JLH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1471</guid>
		<description>Looks like the webmaster of the site wised up and cleaned it up, glad I took screen shots.  There are a lot more examples out there, perhaps I should start pointing it out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the webmaster of the site wised up and cleaned it up, glad I took screen shots.  There are a lot more examples out there, perhaps I should start pointing it out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLH</title>
		<link>http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>JLH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>OMG! Their index total has gone up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><acronym title="Oh my goodness">OMG</acronym>! Their index total has gone up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>Amazing that it still exists, very true.  What is even more amazing, if not down right comical is just how amateurish it was done.  

On this Web Spam Poster Child's site, the hidden spam takes up 4 times as much as the actual content and no one thought anyone might notice?  :-()

Even more hilarious is the link to a link exchange site at the very bottom, even below all the hidden spam!  Ya gotta love that!

I also agree that some sites do it not considering it as spam but I would go once step further and suggest that maybe they don't even know what web spam is.

It may seem obvious to most people with experience but there are so many people out there throwing together websites with no experience at all that it seems those with any real experience are in a very small minority.

Or well, at least the web is never dull or boring.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing that it still exists, very true.  What is even more amazing, if not down right comical is just how amateurish it was done.  </p>
<p>On this Web Spam Poster Child&#8217;s site, the hidden spam takes up 4 times as much as the actual content and no one thought anyone might notice?  :-()</p>
<p>Even more hilarious is the link to a link exchange site at the very bottom, even below all the hidden spam!  Ya gotta love that!</p>
<p>I also agree that some sites do it not considering it as spam but I would go once step further and suggest that maybe they don&#8217;t even know what web spam is.</p>
<p>It may seem obvious to most people with experience but there are so many people out there throwing together websites with no experience at all that it seems those with any real experience are in a very small minority.</p>
<p>Or well, at least the web is never dull or boring.  <img src='http://www.jlh-design.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLH</title>
		<link>http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>JLH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>Craig, I agree.  The real pros at spamming have moved on to bigger an better things.  This is actually quite amateurish, but still amazing that it exists.  

Granted, Google may have just discounted this hidden junk like they do with meta keywords.  

I'm also pretty sure there are a fair amount of sites that do this because they think its what the search engines want, not even considering it spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, I agree.  The real pros at spamming have moved on to bigger an better things.  This is actually quite amateurish, but still amazing that it exists.  </p>
<p>Granted, <strong style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">G</strong><strong style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">o</strong><strong style="color: rgb(255, 255, 77);">o</strong><strong style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">g</strong><strong style="color: rgb(0, 128, 0);">l</strong><strong style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">e</strong> may have just discounted this hidden junk like they do with meta keywords.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also pretty sure there are a fair amount of sites that do this because they think its what the search engines want, not even considering it spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/04/the-poster-child-for-web-spam/#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem I think exists is that some people who do that kind of spamming don't actually know it is wrong.

Sure, they of course should know but you wouldn't believe the number of clients I have had asking for me to do something like that for their site because they heard that was the way to do things.

I explain exactly what it is they are asking me to do and they are at the same time shocked and embarrassed.

That's not to say everyone who does it is innocent but I have run into this sort of thing with too many people that I know personally and know they wouldn't knowingly try to game anyone, let alone a search engine.

On the other hand, look at all the smoke and mirrors that some "SEO Experts" try to foist on others.  They are attempting to be "Whitehat" in that what they suggest is not necessarily bad, other than more often than not being a waste of time.

Other than the true cheats out there, I think one of the biggest problems is a lack of education and a wealth of misinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem I think exists is that some people who do that kind of spamming don&#8217;t actually know it is wrong.</p>
<p>Sure, they of course should know but you wouldn&#8217;t believe the number of clients I have had asking for me to do something like that for their site because they heard that was the way to do things.</p>
<p>I explain exactly what it is they are asking me to do and they are at the same time shocked and embarrassed.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say everyone who does it is innocent but I have run into this sort of thing with too many people that I know personally and know they wouldn&#8217;t knowingly try to game anyone, let alone a search engine.</p>
<p>On the other hand, look at all the smoke and mirrors that some &#8220;<acronym title="Search Engine Optimizer">SEO</acronym> Experts&#8221; try to foist on others.  They are attempting to be &#8220;Whitehat&#8221; in that what they suggest is not necessarily bad, other than more often than not being a waste of time.</p>
<p>Other than the true cheats out there, I think one of the biggest problems is a lack of education and a wealth of misinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
